14 Comments

  1. Does CM discuss making a multiplication table in one of her volumes? My oldest is resisting memorizing tables and it’s slowing him down in pre-algebra.

  2. Have you tried xtramath? Instead of straight table memory (which we’ve also done), you memorize by repeatedly *doing* the math. I’ve made moving on or having certain privileges again tied to passing xtramath levels when extra motivation is needed. 😉

  3. We’ve just started back in on xtra math practice. But I think a screen time reward might be a good incentive. He is just ‘naturally’ good at math (always has been able to do large sums in his head and complex logic puzzles) so it hasn’t been a huge hinderance so far. Thanks for the suggestion.

  4. Thanks for this… and I was so excited to hear you were answering my question! ! Especially since I now realize I had really no idea what you meant by slow reading, haha… but now I have some ideas. (Oh, and actually my husband is working through LOTR with the kids – they already did the Hobbit – so they are getting a nice slow pace for that too!)

  5. I can’t seem to find my way back to Abby who asked if anyone else was reading “The Roots of American Order.” If you see this, Abby, I asked my Mom at the Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal about that study guide and she said that it’s being revised and will be up on the center’s website in January as a free download. Happy reading!

  6. I heard Cindy Rollins talk about using the Michael Clay Thompson books in Morning Time for grammar. Has anyone else tried this? We tend to take whatever part of speech is in our CC memory work and make up silly sentences that use that and briefly diagram them. We’ve also read Grammar-Land by M.L. Nesbitt in Morning Time, which is hilarious.
    Thank you for discussing slow reading! I was just starting to feel some anxiety about the time we’ve spent with The Three Musketeers and how we may not get to another book this semester.

  7. In John Miedema’s book titled Slow Reading, he discusses why and how to read slowly. (Have you read this Brandy?) His point is that some books are worth reading slowly in order to meditate and fully understand what they are saying. Other books should be read quickly because they are more shallow and don’t really reward that kind of sustained attention.

    If you want more info on slow reading, I found it to be a really enjoyable book. Here is the link to Miedema’s book on amazon: http://a.co/0eb9cnv

    This discussion also made me think of Eat this book : a conversation in the art of spiritual reading by Eugene H. Peterson. Books we dwell on at length become part of us.

  8. I haven’t heard of either of those books! Thank you! I am putting both of them on my wishlist … ♥ I love that: “Books we dwell on at length become part of us.”

  9. I am one of those unicorn people who doesn’t have a lot of trouble reconciling the Classical and CM approaches. Most of our memorization at home is of beautiful things: poetry, scripture, literature, hymns. Familiarity with drier facts usually suffices to spur conversation and also suits my lazy bones! So…I often find that CM purists mischaracterize Classical education in its modern revival idiom. (I was introduced to CM when I, as a classical educator, was explaining how I always sought out poetic, gorgeously illustrated biographies and read novels aloud constantly, and was told “you might be Charlotte Mason….”) But the refrain in all Classical Conversations material in particular is constantly emphasizing the meaninglessness of grammar without dialectic, the primacy of goodness, beauty and truth, and literature and play as the main tutors of littles. My own process is a clumsy amalgamation steeped in words-words-words! But I just wanted to add that although you ladies often make laughing allusions (I assume) to CC, most well-read Classical tutors would agree with almost everything you conclude in this conversation and own it as essentially part and parcel with modern Classical approaches as well as CM. Thanks, girls. Love this podcast.

  10. Hi Elizabeth! Brandy is actually the only one of us three who is all-in on CM. I came into educational philosophy through the classical conversation (ha!), and love CM as one way to apply what I think are her classical values and virtues of education. I agree that many in a CM-only world misunderstand classical.

    I think it’s unfortunate if any of our jokes (and we laugh at ourselves as much as anyone!) appear to be slighting a particular group – we keep them non-specific because we want to address a mindset, not a program. The facts-drill mindset can be found outside the neoclassical approach and outside CC, and I’ve seen CC applications that are about contextualizing the memory work and loving TGB, too.

    We hope to stimulate thought and conversation, and poke only at complacencies and anyone who thinks education can be found in following a formula rather than loving life and learning for its own sake.

    Thanks for adding to that conversation!

Comments are closed.